In abstract
An individual matching Democratic Sen. Susan Rubio’s description is accused in federal courtroom paperwork of soliciting bribes and unlawful marketing campaign contributions. Rubio, who’s not been charged with against the law, denies the allegations, however she’s not chair of the Senate Insurance coverage Committee as investigations proceed
As fires rage by means of Southern California and exacerbate the state’s insurance coverage disasterthe California Senate has nobody answerable for its Insurance coverage Committee attributable to questions surrounding a federal corruption investigation.
Senate President Professional Tem Mike McGuire stated he’s ready to listen to from federal prosecutors about Sen. Susan Rubiowho’s been questioned in a federal corruption probe, earlier than making a call about reappointing her to her earlier place as chair of the Senate Insurance coverage Committee.
“We have requested and are awaiting additional information from the U.S. Attorney’s Office before finalizing any decisions,” McGuire’s workplace advised CalMatters in an e mail.
Rubio, a Democrat from Baldwin Park, stated she’s “currently not involved” within the federal corruption investigation that has already ensnared a handful of different officers in San Bernardino County, Compton, Commerce and Baldwin Park.
Federal officers haven’t recognized Rubio by identify within the case. Nonetheless, there may be no one else matching the outline of “Person 20,” who’s accused in lately launched federal courtroom paperwork of asking for $240,000 in bribes from a hashish firm and accepting $30,000 in unlawful marketing campaign contributions. The allegations stem from when Rubio was a member of the Baldwin Park Metropolis Council.
The U.S. Lawyer’s Workplace in Los Angeles is overseeing the case. A spokesperson declined to remark about who Individual 20 is or say when – or if – costs could be filed towards them.
Specialists in federal corruption instances counsel that McGuire is correct to be involved.
At CalMatters’ request, three former federal prosecutors reviewed the courtroom paperwork.
The prosecutors – certainly one of them a former U.S. Lawyer – stated there’s no method the U.S. Division of Justice would make public that a lot figuring out details about a suspect in a corruption investigation in the event that they didn’t assume they may persuade a jury of his or her guilt.
“If federal prosecutors are putting that level of detail — especially in a public corruption matter — into a public-facing document, they are fairly confident that information is 120% correct,” stated Carrie H. Cohena former assistant U.S. Lawyer in New York and former chief of the general public integrity bureau on the New York State Lawyer Normal’s Workplace.
Mark D. Chutkowthe previous chief of the U.S. Lawyer’s public corruption unit and prison division in Detroit, stated “it would appear that there is more due to drop in this case.”
Chutkow stated relating to public corruption instances, federal prosecutors usually have their sights on the “highest-ranking public officials and not necessarily on … middle persons and the bribers themselves.”
“This Person No. 20 would be a higher-ranking (official) and the more important target of the federal investigation,” he stated. “So one would think that they would want to finish the job.”
Final week, Rubio declined to be interviewed by a CalMatters reporter as she departed the Senate after the primary flooring session of the brand new yr. As an alternative, her workplace responded with an emailed assertion.
“It’s unfortunate that Senator Rubio continues to receive questions based on a case that she is currently not involved with,” her spokesperson, Matthew Z’berg, stated in an e mail. “Senator Rubio’s focus is on serving the constituents of the 22nd Senate District and addressing important issues affecting California families.”
Spokesperson says Rubio didn’t need insurance coverage chair
Rubio did reply to Senate Professional Tem McGuire’s resolution to not give her a committee management submit when he lately introduced his assignments for the two-year session that kicked off final Monday.
Be taught extra about legislators talked about on this story.
Final session, Rubio chaired the Senate Insurance coverage Committee. The submit was listed as a “vacancy” on McGuire’s listing.
Z’berg stated that Rubio advised McGuire she wasn’t excited about being the insurance coverage committee chair any extra. She “encouraged (McGuire) to appoint a new chair to be announced with all other assignments.
“She also conveyed to him that by leaving the position open, he would be feeding into false narratives and speculation,” Z’berg stated.
Rubio additionally took a thinly-veiled shot at McGuire, suggesting that he’s enjoying politics by leaving the seat vacant attributable to hypothesis McGuire is eying a run for California Insurance coverage Commissioner when he phrases out in 2026.
“Insurance issues affecting consumers across the state are of particular interest to him,” the assertion learn. “It is a critical issue that he has been very vocal about in the past, and will likely continue to do so.”
In an announcement emailed Friday, McGuire stated “we’ve been leading on consumer-focused insurance reform for years — it’s personal for me because of the wildfires that have devastated the communities I represent. And this year will be no different.
“The Southern California fires make it all the more clear how critical this issue is. Any premise that any legislation would be delayed is unequivocally BS,” he stated. “A committee has been formed and we will name an insurance chair in the very near future.”
The Insurance coverage Committee is just not scheduled to fulfill till March. Payments have to be in print for a minimum of 30 days earlier than legislators can act on them, so any new insurance-related laws launched this week wouldn’t be heard till a minimum of February.
Is Sen. Rubio “Person 20”?
The lately launched federal paperwork are a plea settlement signed by former Baldwin Park Metropolis Lawyer Robert Tafoya. Federal officers launched the settlement late final yr. Within the settlement, Tafoya says he helped facilitate bribes to native officers from firms searching for marijuana permits.
The Los Angeles Occasions was the primary information outlet to report that Rubio matched the outline of “Person 20.” The plea settlement describes Individual 20 as a public official, able to have the ability to fireplace town lawyer, who gained a main for state workplace in 2018. No different native officers match the outline.
The plea settlement says Individual 20 sought $240,000 from a marijuana firm searching for a metropolis allow, however the firm refused to pay that a lot so the deal fell by means of. Individual 20 additionally sought and acquired $30,000 from Tafoya in a scheme to drum up help for Individual 20’s 2018 state marketing campaign, the paperwork say. Tafoya stated he agreed to pay Individual 20, in alternate for assurance he’d maintain his metropolis job and get state work from Individual 20 after the election, in accordance with his plea settlement.
Tafoya admitted to federal tax evasion and bribery costs in 2023, however prosecutors saved the plea settlement secret till final month since Tafoya had agreed to take part within the ongoing investigation.
“I have no idea who Person 20 is, but I am completely confident that the U.S. Attorney’s Office would not include these declaratory statements about Person 20’s actions unless they were very confident they could prove the truth of those statements in a court of law,” stated McGregor Scotta twice-appointed former U.S. Lawyer based mostly in Sacramento.
Rubio has circuitously answered whether or not she’s “Person 20.” She advised the LA Occasions in an announcement that she “volunteered hours of her time” aiding the authorities of their investigation and that she “has no reason to believe that she would be included in any criminal allegations.”
Senate reviewing ethics criticism
Invoice Essaylia Republican Meeting member from Corona, requested the Meeting and Senate ethics committees to take up investigations after the LA Occasions report final month.
Essayli spent about 4 years as a federal prosecutor within the U.S. Lawyer’s Workplace that unsealed Tafoya’s plea settlement.
Essayli stated he has no first-hand data about this case since he left that job in 2018, however he stated the allegations outlined within the plea settlement are troubling sufficient for the Legislature to behave by itself with out ready for prosecutors. His ethics criticism additionally doesn’t determine Rubio by identify.
“When the Biden DOJ actually makes specific allegations like that against a sitting legislator, I don’t think we can wait as a public body for that investigation to play out – criminal investigations can take years to develop,” Essayli advised CalMatters. “Meanwhile, this individual is still sitting in office. They still wield power in the name of the public, and they could be engaged in the same activity.”
Erin V. Peth, the chief counsel for the Senate Ethics Committee, advised CalMatters Essayli’s criticism is beneath evaluation, however supplied no different particulars.
No girl California legislator has ever been indicted on public corruption costs whereas in workplace. A number of male Assemblymembers and senators have been charged with such crimes over time.
In 2010state costs had been filed towards Los Angeles County Democratic Sen. Roderick Wright for voter fraud, perjury and different crimes stemming from him mendacity about truly residing in his district. Then-Gov. Jerry Brown later pardoned Wright.
In 2016a federal decide sentenced San Francisco’s Democratic Sen. Leland Yee to 5 years in jail for doing political favors in alternate for marketing campaign money.
Additionally in 2016a federal decide sentenced Sen. Ron Calderon of Montebello to 42 months in federal jail for receiving over $150,000 in bribes. His brother, Assemblymember Tom Calderon, was sentenced to a yr in jail for laundering his brother’s bribe cash.
Following the Yee and Calderon indictments, voters in 2016 authorised Proposition 50which supplies legislators the authority to droop a disgraced colleague with out pay. Doing so requires a two-thirds vote of the lawmaker’s chamber.