Do owners associations trump CA’s ADU legal guidelines?

In a dispute over whether or not he can convert his three-story condominium’s storage into its personal ground-floor condo, one Carlsbad resident is waging a battle in opposition to his owners affiliation.

As CalMatters’ Ben Christopher explains, Adam Hardesty is an unemployed undertaking supervisor and HOA board vp. After months of analysis and planning, he determined to show the 373-square-feet storage of his rental right into a standalone accent dwelling unit, or ADU. Hardesty plans to outfit the ADU with a kitchenette, bed room and loo and lease it out as a supply of passive revenue.

However the Mystic Level Householders Affiliation that Hardesty belongs to desires to quash these plans — kicking off a authorized dispute that raises the query: Who has the ultimate say about what will get constructed the place?

Amid a extreme housing crunch, California lawmakers for the previous decade have handed laws to encourage extra housing, with state officers at instances suing cities that don’t comply. A number of ADU-related legal guidelines have additionally chipped away native authorities’ skill to reject housing. For Hardesty, he cites a 2019 legislation that voids any owners affiliation’s rule that “prohibits or unreasonably restricts” the development of ADUs.

However the legislation applies to parcels of land which are “zoned for single-family residential use,” and Hardesty lives in a condominium multi-plex. In keeping with Hardesty’s former legal professional, the owners affiliation’s lawyer argued that as a result of Hardesty’s parcel just isn’t “zoned for single-family residential use,” the legislation doesn’t apply.

Hardesty’s scenario underscores the fuzzy position owners associations play in state coverage: Although they’re often categorised as nonprofits, their position is just like a city’s planning-and-building division, and at instances function the final bastion for native management.

So what occurs if a resident butts heads with their owners associations over a state legislation? They’ll should duke it out in courtroom, for the reason that California Division of Housing and Neighborhood Growth doesn’t “have the ability to take enforcement actions directed at HOAs,” mentioned one division spokesperson.

Learn extra right here.

Members of the California Legislative Black Caucus gathered on the state Capitol Thursday to unveil its package deal of 15 precedence payments for the yr.

Chances are you’ll recall a few of the payments from the caucus’ reparations invoice package deal final yr, together with one proposal to create a fund to lower violence in native communities and one other to compensate residents whose land was taken by “racially-motivated” eminent area. One measure would additionally “prohibit slavery in all forms,” and is an replace to Proposition 6 to ban compelled jail labor that voters rejected in November.

Caucus chairperson Sen. Akilah Weber Pierson mentioned the measures tackle the “deep generational harms inflicted upon Black Californians.” The San Diego Democrat added that caucus members are additionally taking into consideration federal insurance policies below President Donald Trump.

• Sen. Weber Pierson: “We also cannot and should not ignore what is happening now at a national level, as individuals are implementing policies … to actively dismantle the hard-fought and rightful gains for Black Americans.”

Final yr the caucus excluded two proposals from its package deal that reparation advocates pushed for, and did so once more this yr: One would create a brand new state company to deal with reparations, whereas the opposite would create a fund for reparation insurance policies.

In November the California Air Sources Board authorized a controversial set of latest guidelines for gasoline requirements, which goal to scale back air air pollution however might additionally increase fuel costs. In a shock twist, the state company that critiques the legality of state laws rejected the brand new guidelines this week, writes CalMatters’ Alejandro Lazo.

The Workplace of Administrative Regulation mentioned the principles wanted extra “clarity” and advised the air board that the principles should be clear sufficient “so that the meaning … will be easily understood by those persons directly affected by them.”

The principles confronted sturdy pushback from Republican legislators, who argued that the brand new laws might improve pump costs. In 2023, the air board initially projected the requirements might increase the price of gasoline by 47 cents a gallon, however has since backed away from that quantity. A separate report by the College of Pennsylvania’s Kleinman Heart for Vitality Coverage, discovered the principles might improve fuel by 85 cents by means of 2030.

The air board mentioned it might evaluate the order after which resubmit the principles, which it has 120 days to take action.

Final yr was the most well liked yr in Earth’s recorded historical past.

Learn extra right here.

California lawmakers are contemplating making seasonal firefighters full-time to make sure year-round readiness for wildfires. CalMatters’ Sameea Kamal and video technique director Robert Meeks have a video phase on the $175 million annual proposal as a part of our partnership with PBS SoCal. Watch it right here.

SoCalMatters airs at 5:58 p.m. weekdays on PBS SoCal.