Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., was grilled on CNBC over Vice President Kamala Harris’ plan to impose federal worth controls on meals and groceries in a virtually 20-minute-long debate on “Squawk Box” on Friday.
Harris introduced final week that if elected, her administration would impose federal controls on the value of meals and groceries to maintain companies from exploiting customers. The plan has acquired widespread criticism from economists on the left and proper, who argue that synthetic controls have been tried in communist nations and they don’t work; in reality, they might really improve costs for customers, critics say.
CNBC host Joe Kernen confronted Warren on her assist for the “flawed idea” that even liberal papers like The Washington Submit have known as a “populist gimmick.”
“Competition doesn’t come in,” he mentioned. “If the price of beef is too high, people don’t move the chicken. Competitors don’t come in to undercut where the beef prices are. Nothing works when you try to artificially control prices. It’s just a supply and demand issue. It’s a flawed idea.”
“Squawk Box” co-host Joe Kernen confronted Sen. Elizabeth Warren on her assist for Vice President Harris’ price-control plan. (CNBC/Screenshot)
“It’s not price gouging that’s the issue,” he mentioned, asking her when she was going to suggest a coverage that will “really help” the center class.
“I understand if you wanted to do a lecture about this, but let’s just start with where have you been?” Warren shot again at Kernen.
Warren argued that anti-price gouging legal guidelines have been efficient within the dozens of states which have handed them. The federal plan is supposed to fight companies from making the most of customers, as she claimed they did in the course of the pandemic by driving up prices to extend revenue margins.
“Remember we all talked about egg prices. You end up with something like a giant egg producer, Cal-Maine. And Cal-Maine raises the price of eggs. Their profit margins increased by 718%. That’s not just passing along costs,” she argued.
NEWSOM DODGES QUESTION ON HARRIS PRICE CONTROLS: ‘SHE HASN’T PUT OUT THE DETAILS’
Sen. Warren used the instance of egg costs to argue that there wanted to be worth controls on meals and groceries. (AP/Terry Chea)
The interview remained heated as Warren accused Kernen of not letting her communicate and Kernen accused Warren of giving deceptive examples and never precisely presenting how the market works.
“This is a way you never lose an argument, Senator, because no one can ever say anything back to you. It’s frustrating,” Kernen advised Warren, as she repeatedly requested the anchor if he invited her on this system “just to lecture” her.
“Let’s go back to Cal-Maine,” Kernen mentioned later. “Avian flu caused the destruction of 40 million eggs. They have 20% market share. But they don’t control the market. It’s like oil. When oil prices go up for whatever reason, or they go down, when they go down, the price is set for oil. The reason that Cal-Maine made that money was because that’s what happened to the price. The next quarter, they went down in half. They lost 50% of the profits from — they don’t set that price. And neither does Exxon. Exxon does not set the price of oil. So when Exxon is $80 or $100 a barrel, yes, they make record profits. When there was a pandemic, their profits went to almost zero.”
“It’s just the way it is. And to think that the government can decide when prices are too high or too low — the grocery chains have a 2% profit margin. How about Apple with 50% or 40%? How do you decide?” he pressed the senator.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
The Harris marketing campaign has argued that federal worth controls would maintain grocery costs from spiking because of company greed. (iStock)
“This is not the government’s place to do these things. It’s a fool’s errand, and you’re using it to divert from the real cause of inflation over the last four years,” he mentioned, blaming the pandemic’s provide chain points and stimulus spending.
The 2 continued to spar over the problem for a number of extra minutes, with Warren doubling down on her protection of Harris’ price-control plan to fight the continued price-gouging “problem.”
“It is not price controls. This is about when the market itself is not functioning. Sometimes markets don’t function because of a localized emergency. A hurricane. A wildfire. Flooding. And so in states that have these price gouging laws, they can come in and say, look. You can do some price increases, but if you’re going above a certain level, you have to be able to justify it. You have to show what you’re doing in passing along costs,” she argued.
“The whole point is to get markets that are more competitive,” she continued. “That’s the job of the FTC. That’s something state attorneys general work on. We just want to put one more tool in the toolbox when CEOs are going on the phone saying, ‘Boy, inflation is great. Because it gives us a chance to raise our prices.'”
