Regardless of The Washington Publish’s frequent sharp criticism of Elon Musk, the paper’s editorial board criticized the Brazilian authorities for transferring to ban X, the social media platform owned by the tech billionaire.
“The billionaire CEO of Tesla and SpaceX is correct when he says a Brazilian jurist’s move to unilaterally prohibit X, which he owns, from operating in the country is an assault on internet speech around the world,” The Publish wrote in an editorial headlined, “In this free speech fight, Musk’s X has marked the right position.”
A Brazilian decide has ordered the “immediate and complete suspension” of the social media platform till it complies with all court docket orders and pays present fines. One other Musk-led firm, Starlink, can also be going through a authorized battle to stay alive in Brazil after a Brazilian Supreme Court docket justice ordered that Starlink’s monetary accounts in Brazil be frozen.
HARRIS-WALZ ADMIN WOULD BE ‘PERFECT NIGHTMARE’ FOR FREE SPEECH, TURLEY WARNS
The Washington Publish editorial board criticized the Brazilian authorities for transferring to ban X, a social media platform owned by billionaire Elon Musk. (Getty Photos)
Brazilian Supreme Court docket Justice Alexandre de Moraes’ actions to close down X, have come at “a substantial cost to free expression,” the Publish wrote, “with mandates for removals and even arrest warrants often issued under seal and with scant reasoning to support them.”
The paper famous, “The recent move against X is both more of the same and just plain more: After X ignored the court’s orders to block more than 140 accounts, the justice warned he would arrest its legal representative in Brazil.”
Consequently, Musk’s group left the nation, which allowed the state of affairs to escalate additional in Brazil. “That lack of a physical presence, in turn, led Mr. Moraes to instruct that X be blocked for all 220 million Brazilians — who, he said, could face fines of almost $9,000 a day if they tried to circumvent the restriction,” The Publish reported.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE COVERAGE OF MEDIA AND CULTURE
“If this sounds authoritarian, it is,” the paper stated. “Whatever the threat to democracy that the accounts Mr. Moraes wanted gone might have posed, the threat from one government official limiting the speech of 220 million people is greater.”
“Taken together with Mr. Moraes’s choice to freeze the assets of internet-provider Starlink, a separate company of Mr. Musk’s, this move aligns Brazil not with the free world but with the likes of China and Russia,” The Publish wrote.
ELON MUSK SLAMS NEW YORK TIMES WRITER FOR CALLING THE CONSTITUTION ‘DANGEROUS’
Brazilian Supreme Court docket Justice Alexandre de Moraes’ actions to close down X, have come at “a substantial cost to free expression,” The Publish wrote. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Name, Inc by way of Getty Photos)
The paper’s protection of Musk comes after the billionaire has routinely been a goal of criticism for the Publish. The paper repeatedly attacked Musk as he sought to take possession of then-Twitter in 2022.
Simply final month, a Publish reporter advised the Biden White Home ought to censor “misinformation” from an interview Musk was about to conduct with former President Trump.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Fox Enterprise’ Stepheny Worth contributed to this report.
