IN SUMMARY:
The writer withdrew the utilities invoice from Meeting consideration someday earlier than the Legislature’s deadline.
Learn this story in English
A final-minute proposal by California lawmakers to supply some reduction from rising electrical energy payments is probably going lifeless.
Meeting Invoice 3121 was faraway from a key Senate committee this afternoon. A supply instructed CalMatters which means it will not be voted on earlier than the legislative session ends on Saturday.
The writer of the invoice, assemblywoman Cottie Petrie-Norrisan Irvine Democrat, eliminated it from the agenda of the Senate Everlasting Choose Committee on Power, Utilities and Communications. His workplace didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark.
The invoice would have given households a small, one-time credit score of between $30 and $70. It could have been funded by about $500 million in controversial cuts to utility applications that assist low-income residents and faculties in areas served by Southern California Edison, Pacific Gasoline & Electrical and San Diego Gasoline & Electrical.
For weeks, legislative leaders and Gov. Gavin Newsom’s workers have been engaged on a set of proposals designed to deal with California’s twin clear vitality challenges: attaining clear, carbon-free vitality necessities and decreasing electrical charges which are among the many highest within the nation.
The measure was probably the most controversial of a collection of vitality measures that had been launched earlier this week. The Legislature and Newsom had already considerably scaled again their plans to cut back Californians’ electrical energy payments and pace up renewable vitality initiatives.
The Petrie-Norris transfer got here hours after Meeting Speaker Robert Rivas, D-Salinas, forged doubt on whether or not he would permit any of these measures to come back up for a vote this 12 months.
Rivas stated in a press release that “we agree with Governor Newsom on the absolute urgency of getting this done,” however added that he wouldn’t “push through bills that have not been sufficiently vetted in public hearings. Doing so could have unintended consequences for Californians’ pocketbooks.”
Petrie-Norris saved underneath dialogue a standalone vitality invoice that handed out of a Senate committee at this time. Meeting Invoice 3264 would require the Public Service Fee to check how one can scale back the prices of increasing transmission capability and report back to the Legislature on vitality effectivity applications funded by customers’ utility payments.
Different vitality payments that may expedite photo voltaic and different renewable vitality initiatives stay on the books at this time.
