The controversy about the advantages and dangers of fluoride is ongoing, as RFK Jr. — incoming President Trump’s decide for HHS secretary — pushes to take away it from the U.S. water provide.
“Fluoride is an industrial waste related to arthritis, bone fractures, bone most cancers, IQ loss, neurodevelopmental issues and thyroid illness,” RFK wrote in a put up on X in November.
A brand new examine revealed in JAMA Pediatrics on Jan. 6 discovered one other correlation between fluoride publicity and youngsters’s IQs.
RFK JR. CALLS FOR REMOVAL OF FLUORIDE FROM DRINKING WATER, SPARKING DEBATE
Research co-author Kyla Taylor, PhD, who relies in North Carolina, famous that fluoridated water has been used “for decades” to cut back dental cavities and enhance oral well being.
“However, there is concern that pregnant women and children are getting fluoride from many sources, including drinking water, water-added foods and beverages, teas, toothpaste, floss and mouthwash, and that their total fluoride exposure is too high and may affect fetal, infant and child neurodevelopment,” she instructed Fox Information Digital.
The new analysis, led by scientists on the Nationwide Institute of Environmental Well being Sciences (NIEHS), analyzed 74 epidemiological research on youngsters’s IQ and fluoride publicity.
The research measured fluoride in ingesting water and urine throughout 10 international locations, together with Canada, China, Denmark, India, Iran, Mexico, Pakistan, New Zealand, Spain and Taiwan. (None had been performed within the U.S.)
The meta-analysis discovered a “statistically significant association” between larger fluoride publicity and decrease youngsters’s IQ scores, in line with Taylor.
“[It showed] that the more fluoride a child is exposed to, the more likely that child’s IQ will be lower than if they were not exposed,” she mentioned.
These outcomes had been in line with six earlier meta-analyses, all of which reported the identical “statistically significant inverse associations” between fluoride publicity and youngsters’s IQs, Taylor emphasised.
The analysis discovered that for each 1mg/L improve in urinary fluoride, there was a 1.63-point lower in IQ.
‘Safe’ publicity ranges
The World Well being Group (WHO) has established 1.5mg/L because the “upper safe limit” of fluoride in ingesting water.
“There is concern that pregnant women and children are getting fluoride from many sources.”
In the meantime, the U.S. Public Well being Service recommends a fluoride focus of 0.7 mg/L in ingesting water.
“There was not enough data to determine if 0.7 mg/L of fluoride exposure in drinking water affected children’s IQs,” Taylor famous.
FDA BANS RED FOOD DYE DUE TO POTENTIAL CANCER RISK
Increased ranges of the chemical might be present in wells and group water serving practically three million folks within the U.S., the researcher famous.
She inspired pregnant ladies and fogeys of babies to be aware of their whole fluoride consumption.
“If their water is fluoridated, they may wish to replace tap water with low-fluoride bottled water, like purified water, and limit exposure from other sources, such as dental products or black tea,” she mentioned.
“Parents can use low-fluoride bottled water to mix with powdered infant formula and limit use of fluoridated toothpaste by young children.”
For extra Well being articles, go to www.foxnews.com/well being.
Whereas the analysis didn’t intend to handle broader public well being implications of water fluoridation within the U.S., Taylor advised that the findings may assist inform future analysis into the affect of fluoride on youngsters’s well being.
Dental well being knowledgeable shares cautions
In response to this examine and different earlier analysis, Dr. Ellie Phillips, DDS, an oral well being educator primarily based in Austin, Texas, instructed Fox Information Digital that she doesn’t help water fluoridation.
“I join those who vehemently oppose public water fluoridation, and I question why our water supplies are still fluoridated in the 21st century,” she wrote in an electronic mail.
“There are non-fluoridated cities and countries where the public enjoy high levels of oral health, which in some cases appear better than those that are fluoridated.”
CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER
Phillips referred to as the fluoride debate “confusing” even amongst dentists, because the American Dental Affiliation (ADA) advocates for fluoride use for cavity prevention via water fluoridation, toothpaste and mouthwash — “sometimes in high concentrations.”
“[But] biologic (holistic) dentists generally encourage their patients to fear fluoride and avoid its use entirely, even if their teeth are ravaged by tooth decay,” she mentioned.
“Topical fluoride is beneficial, while systemic consumption poses risks.”
Phillips inspired the general public to contemplate various fluoride compounds, the impact of various concentrations and the “extreme difference” between making use of fluoride topically and ingesting it.
“Topical fluoride is beneficial, while systemic consumption poses risks,” she cautioned.
“People should take cost of their very own oral well being utilizing pure and knowledgeable methods.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
The examine acquired funding from the Nationwide Institute of Environmental Well being Sciences (NIEHS), the Nationwide Institutes of Well being (NIH) and the Intramural Analysis Program.