FIRST ON FOX: A controversial judicial advocacy group funded by left-wing nonprofits continues to work with judges and consultants concerned in local weather change litigation regardless of publicly downplaying the extent of these connections.
“CJP doesn’t participate in litigation, support or coordinate with any parties in litigation, or advise judges on how they should rule in any case,” the Environmental Legislation Institute Local weather Judiciary Venture President Jordan Diamond wrote in a current letter to The Wall Avenue Journal in response to criticism of the undertaking.
The Washington, D.C.-based Environmental Legislation Institute (ELI) created the Local weather Judiciary Venture (CJP) in 2018, establishing a first-of-its-kind useful resource to supply “reliable, up-to-date information” about local weather change litigation, in accordance with the group. The undertaking’s attain has prolonged to varied state and federal courts, together with highly effective appellate courts, and comes as numerous cities and states pursue high-profile litigation in opposition to the oil business.
A Fox Information Digital overview reveals that a number of CJP skilled attorneys and judges have shut ties to the curriculum and are deeply concerned in local weather litigation.
Princeton College professor Michael Oppenheimer contributed to the CJP curriculum and introduced “Evidence of Change: Judging Climate Litigation” with CJP’s Sandra Nichols Thiam on the 2022 Ninth Circuit Judicial Convention July 20, 2022.
Oppenheimer has a protracted historical past of submitting climate-related amicus briefs from 2019-2022 in litigation throughout a number of states.
Robin Kundis Craig, a professor on the College of Utah’s Legislation Faculty, wrote a module for CJP in 2022 and has additionally filed a number of amicus briefs exhibiting she is lively in court docket circumstances.
One instance occurred in 2023, when Craig is listed on an order granting authorized students’ request to file amicus, which was signed by Justice Mark Recktenwald, who, Fox Information Digital beforehand reported, quietly disclosed final 12 months that he introduced for an April course in collaboration with the Environmental Legislation Institute Local weather Judiciary Venture.
Recktenwald co-presented at a December 2022 Nationwide Judicial School webinar sponsored by CJP, “Hurricanes in a Changing Climate and Related Litigation.” In 2023, he co-presented with Professor Robert DeConto at a Nationwide Judicial School seminar, “Rising Seas and Litigation: What Judges Need to Know about Warming-Driven Sea-Level Rise.”
In October 2023, Recktenwald’s Hawaii Supreme Courtroom denied an enchantment from oil firms to toss a Honolulu local weather misinformation swimsuit.
Craig additionally filed an amicus in Hawaii state court docket in July 2022, the place an order was signed by Decide Jeffrey Crabtree permitting the temporary to be filed. Crabtree is a member of the Nationwide Judicial School Curriculum Growth Committee, which creates curricula for “Environmental Law Essential for the Judiciary.”
“Don’t underestimate the importance of the role of state court judges in environmental law,” the curriculum’s web site states.
Ann Carlson, who joined the Biden administration in 2021, served on ELI’s board of administrators for years whereas additionally “providing pro bono consulting” for Sher Edling, an eco regulation agency representing various jurisdictions, on litigation in opposition to oil firms, monetary disclosures confirmed. Sher Edling counsel Michael Burger has additionally participated in a number of ELI occasions, and former Sher Edling lawyer Meredith Wilensky was beforehand an ELI Public Curiosity Legislation Fellow.
BIDEN ADMIN REPORT COULD SLOW TRUMP’S EFFORTS TO UNLEASH DOMESTIC NATURAL GAS, EXPERTS SAY
Burger is the manager director of the Sabin Heart for Local weather Change Legislation and an ELI presenter who has filed amicus briefs in assist of plaintiffs in local weather circumstances throughout the US.
UCLA’s Emmett Institute on Local weather Change and the Surroundings hosted a chat in October 2017 with Sher Edling’s Vic Sher, “Suing Over Climate Change Damages: The First Wave of Climate Lawsuits.” Ann Carlson was the moderator for that dialogue.
John Dernbach, listed as an skilled on CJP’s web site, filed an amicus temporary in 2019 as a part of a short of authorized students in assist of plaintiffs in Metropolis of Oakland v BP.
“Judges attending Climate Judiciary Project events are advised that they are walking into a left-wing lobbying shop,” American Power Institute President Jason Isaac instructed Fox Information Digital. “Under the guise of ‘judicial education,’ CJP uses activist academics to give a pro-plaintiff sneak peek at climate change lawsuits. This kind of politicking underlines that the climate change lawsuits themselves are a left-wing attack on our quality of life.
“The Supreme Courtroom may have a possibility early subsequent 12 months to listen to a case asking whether or not blue states and far-left mayors like Brandon Johnson can sue vitality suppliers for local weather change. Allow us to hope the court docket takes the case and ends Inexperienced New Deal lawfare.”
Fox News Digital previously reported that since it was founded more than five years ago, the project has crafted 13 curriculum modules and hosted 42 events, and more than 1,700 judges have participated in its activities. And multiple judges serve as advisers at CJP, potentially having an impact on its curriculum and modules.
“So-called ‘climate change lawsuits,’ lawsuits claiming that private companies should be monetarily liable for damage to public infrastructure allegedly caused by climate change, have exploded in the past five years,” GOP Sen. Ted Cruz wrote in a letter to Environmental Law Institute earlier this year.
“In tandem with this unprecedented litigation, the Environmental Law Institute (ELI) launched a ‘first-of-its-kind effort’ to supply judges with ‘education on climate science, the impacts of climate change, and the ways climate science is arising in the law.’ It seems that ELI’s objective in offering this ‘education,’ nevertheless, could also be to affect judges to aspect with plaintiffs in local weather change circumstances.”
The letter went on to label Carlson as “one of many program’s architects” and requested “info to permit the Committee to judge the efforts of each Ms. Carlson and ELI to affect the federal judiciary in its adjudication of local weather litigation.”
Cruz alleged that “ELI intends to perform through the courts what it can not get enacted into regulation: a radical environmental agenda.”
“To assist judges attain these ‘appropriate’ choices, the Venture developed the ‘Climate Science and Law for Judges Curriculum’ (the Curriculum). Whereas ELI claims the Venture is ‘neutral’ and ‘objective,’ the Curriculum reads like a playbook for judges to seek out in favor of plaintiffs in synthetic local weather change circumstances in opposition to conventional vitality firms: it consists of programs that ‘show how climate science is built on long-established scientific disciplines’ and ‘explore the human-caused component of [global] warming,’ such because the ‘causal connections between emissions’ and ‘changes in the climate.’”
An American Energy Institute report earlier this year alleges CJP “hides its partnership with the plaintiffs as a result of they know these ties create judicial ethics issues.”
AEI says Sandra Nichols Thiam, an ELI vice president and director of judicial education, acknowledged as much in a 2023 press statement, saying, “If we even appeared biased or if there was a whiff of bias, we wouldn’t have the ability to do what we’re doing.”
“Taken collectively, it seems CJP made the thinnest attainable disclosures to create the looks of rectitude,” AEI states. “However their admissions verify that CJP exists to facilitate casual, ex parte contacts between judges and local weather activists beneath the guise of judicial schooling. And secrecy stays important to their operation, whose objective, as Thiam has mentioned, is to develop ‘a body of law that supports climate action.'”
AEI, a group self-described as “dedicated to promoting policies that ensure America’s vitality safety and financial prosperity,” says CJP’s work is “an assault on the rule of regulation.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
“In America, the highly effective aren’t allowed to coax and manipulate judges earlier than their circumstances are heard,” the report states.
In a statement to Fox News Digital, an ELI spokesperson said, “CJP doesn’t take part in litigation, assist or coordinate with any events in litigation, or advise judges on how they need to rule in any case. Our programs present judges with entry to evidence-based details about local weather science and traits within the regulation.
“Of course, experts in the field are welcome to provide their expertise to CJP programs while separately and independently providing that same expertise in another setting that is unrelated to the CJP program. It is routine and encouraged for judges to participate in continuing education that exposes them to expertise in a wide variety of disciplines.”
Fox Information Digital’s Thomas Catenacci contributed to this report