A progressive strategist referred to as out former President Barack Obama on Thursday for making the Democratic Occasion cater to elites in society and abandoning the working class.
In a report from “The Hill” about progressive lawmakers’ “existential crisis” following the 2024 election of President-elect Donald Trump, the outlet spoke to the nameless strategist who suggested the celebration to reclaim the populism it allegedly deserted.
“I don’t know exactly when Democrats lost their comfort with populism, but I don’t think it was because Trump picked it up,” the particular person advised the outlet, pointing to this occurring beneath Obama.
One progressive strategist accused Former President Barack Obama of shifting the Democratic Occasion to catering to elites over the working class. (Scott Olson/Getty Photos)
“I think Trump picked it up because Democrats gave it up during the Obama years, when they started chasing Silicon Valley money and Obama wanted to appeal to college-educated people who think populism is icky and uneducated.”
The strategist added, “We replaced it with a really prominent condescension.”
Since Trump’s win, distinguished progressives have criticized the celebration for shedding concentrate on the problems most affecting the working class. In an announcement following Trump’s win, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., stated, “It should come as no great surprise that a Democratic Party which has abandoned working-class people would find that the working class has abandoned them.”
He added, “First, it was the White working class, and now it is Latino and Black workers as well.”
Different distinguished Democratic figures have made related assessments of the celebration’s failures. Ex-Obama advisor David Axelrod lately advised CNN that there was “a vital decline” amongst working-class assist for the celebration within the 2024 election.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE COVERAGE OF MEDIA AND CULTURE
Distinguished progressives, like Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., argued that the Democratic Occasion misplaced the 2024 election as a result of it deserted the working class. (CHARLY TRIBALLEAU/AFP by way of Getty Photos)
“The only group they won among – Democrats won among – were people who make more than $100,000 a year,” he advised CNN’s Anderson Cooper on November 8, including, “You can’t win national elections that way.”
Axelrod continued, saying, “You can’t approach people like missionaries, and say, ‘We’re here to help you become more like us.’ There’s an unwritten, kind of unspoken – unintended disdain in that… But the party itself has increasingly become a smarty-pants, suburban, college-educated party, and it lends itself to the kind of backlash we’ve seen.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Yet one more Democratic strategist, James Carville, lately penned a New York Occasions op-ed admitting that his celebration failed on financial points and that Trump snagged “middle-class and low-income voters” along with his financial message.
Carville, who beforehand predicted Vice President Kamala Harris would win the presidency, wrote Thursday, “We lost for one very simple reason: It was, it is and it always will be the economy, stupid… Mr. Trump, for the first time in his political career, decisively won by seizing a swath of middle-class and low-income voters focused on the economy. Democrats have flat-out lost the economic narrative.”
