Scientific American editor-in-chief Laura Helmuth apologized after referring to People who voted for President-elect Donald Trump because the “meanest, dumbest, most bigoted” group and “f—ing fascists.”
Helmuth got here beneath hearth final week for blasting Trump supporters after his landslide victory over Vice President Kamala Harris, who was endorsed by Scientific American. As Trump pulled forward on election day, Helmuth repeatedly attacked his supporters on Bluesky, a social media platform that’s well-liked with liberals.
“Every four years I remember why I left Indiana (where I grew up) and remember why I respect the people who stayed and are trying to make it less racist and sexist. The moral arc of the universe isn’t going to bend itself,” she wrote.
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN EDITOR BLASTS ‘F—ING FASCISTS’ WHO ELECTED DONALD TRUMP
The editor of Scientific American isn’t any fan of President-elect Donald Trump. (AP Picture/Evan Vucci)
“Solidarity to everybody whose meanest, dumbest, most bigoted high-school classmates are celebrating early results because f— them to the moon and back,” Helmuth additionally wrote, whereas one other publish mentioned, “I apologize to younger voters that my Gen X is so full of f—ing fascists.”
CLICK HERE FOR MORE COVERAGE OF MEDIA AND CULTURE
Helmuth was criticized for her feedback and X proprietor Elon Musk agreed with a consumer who mentioned she appeared “like a political activist who has taken over a scientific institution.”
Helmuth ultimately apologized and deleted the feedback.
DEMOCRATIC PARTY CONSULTANT WHO VOTED FOR TRUMP SAYS LIBERAL FRIENDS TURNED THEIR BACK ON HER
Scientific American editor-in-chief Laura Helmuth apologized after referring to People who voted for President-elect Donald Trump because the “meanest, dumbest, most bigoted” group and “f—ing fascists.”
“I made a series of offensive and inappropriate posts on my personal Bluesky account on election night, and I am sorry,” Helmuth wrote in an announcement on Bluesky.
“I respect and value people across the political spectrum. These posts, which I have deleted, do not reflect my beliefs; they were a mistaken expression of shock and confusion about the election results,” she continued. “These posts of course do not reflect the position of Scientific American or my colleagues. I am committed to civil communication and editorial objectivity.”
Scientific American, which was based in 1845, payments itself as “the oldest continuously published magazine in the United States” and touts that it has run articles by greater than 200 Nobel Prize winners.
LIFELONG DEM, WHO VOTED TRUMP, CLASHES WITH CBS REPORTER ON THE STATE OF THE BIDEN ECONOMY
Scientific American editor-in-chief Laura Helmuth referred to members of her era as “f—ing fascists.” (Bluesky screenshot)
Scientific American didn’t instantly reply when requested for added remark.
Father or mother firm and writer Springer Nature didn’t instantly reply when requested if it stands by Helmuth.
Following the election, Helmuth additionally shared a Scientific American article titled, “Election Grief Is Real. Here’s How to Cope,” which featured feedback from College of Minnesota emeritus professor and psychotherapist Pauline Boss.
Helmuth was beforehand a well being and science editor on the Washington Put up.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Fox Information Digital’s Lindsay Kornick contributed to this report.
